On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 04:08:10PM +0200, Ludwig Nussel wrote: > This patch series tries to improve dealing with FIT > (configuration-)signatures a bit: > - make signatures work with QEMU. QEMU brings it's own device tree at > a memory address. U-Boot expects public keys in it's own DT though. > So merge both. > - (optionally) enforce signatures so we can't accidentally boot > unsigned fit images. Quite an easy oversight, esp when qemu > previously didn't even use the built in DT. > - make iminfo verify configuration signatures, not just image hashes > > The tests were created with the help of copilot and manual fixups. I > have to admit that the log output of those tests is not something I can > grok. I've left the tags copilot added in the commits even though > checkpatch complains. Not sure what the policy is.
Well, part of the policy currently is following: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst But as Simon asked (so answer there instead please) what output is hard to follow exactly? -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
