On 2026-05-25 21:41:00+02:00, Federico Amedeo Izzo wrote: > Il 2026-05-25 14:12 Neha Malcom Francis ha scritto: > > > On Sat, 23 May 2026 15:04:25 +0200, Federico Amedeo Izzo > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > vccq2 is optional right? Is it verified that the optional code route > > will never > > return ENOSYS and there is handling in regulator_set_enable for NULL > > regulators? > > Hi, > vccq2 is indeed optional, if it's not present, regulator_set_enable() > will handle the NULL regulator and return -ENOSYS. > The warning is skipped for -ENOSYS as we don't want to print warnings > for non existing regulators, > > Below is a section of regulator_set_enable() from regulator_uclass.c > > int regulator_set_enable(struct udevice *dev, bool enable) > { > const struct dm_regulator_ops *ops = dev_get_driver_ops(dev); > struct dm_regulator_uclass_plat *uc_pdata; > int ret, old_enable = 0; > > if (!ops || !ops->set_enable) > return -ENOSYS; > [...] >
Cool that works. Thanks! > Greetings, > Federico Amedeo Izzo
