Hi Quentin, On Wed, 10 Jun 2026 at 17:47, Quentin Schulz <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm fine fixing what needs to be fixed now and improvements later on.
Ok, I'll wait for if/when Tom replies and maybe send a v3 just fixes the main u-boot part. > Note that we generally do not like complete rewrites in one patch but > rather small incremental changes (which may end up in the same result, > but is "more reviewable"). We don't have a maintainer for that feature, > though Tom is the "catch-all" maintainer, so maybe you can convince him > a full rewrite is ok. In any case, I'm sure we would really appreciate > tests (I don't think we have any from the cursory check I just made) so > make sure to include some (especially for the issues you encountered so > we don't regress!). I haven't touched it for a long time. But from what I remember fixing the issues in it was basically rewriting it because of the code style etc being so different from the rest of u-boot. Maybe I can use AI for good and have it generate a series of patches from my version. I'm assuming sensible non-spam AI assisted changes are ok :) Cheers, Daniel
