On Wed, Jul 08, 2026 at 10:05:32PM +0000, Jonas Karlman wrote: > xPL_<name> symbols should typically depend on the associated xPL symbol. > > Add missing depends on xPL to xPL_<name> symbols to avoid the xPL_<name> > symbols being available when the associated xPL symbol is disabled. > > Signed-off-by: Jonas Karlman <[email protected]> > --- > common/Kconfig | 2 ++ > lib/Kconfig | 7 ++++++- > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Did this go through CI? I ask because with SPL/TPL, we have the problem of PowerPC being special from the rest of the world with these symbols and I want to be sure everything still is building, before I do a before/after size check on the series (and probably keep the binaries, so I can checksum before/after and make sure they're the same). -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
