On 10/05/2011 07:13 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > Introduce CONFIG_SPL_NO_CPU_SUPPORT_CODE to avoid compiling the CPU support > library. This can be useful on some setups. > > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <[email protected]> > Cc: Stefano Babic <[email protected]> > Cc: Wolfgang Denk <[email protected]> > Cc: Detlev Zundel <[email protected]> > Cc: Scott Wood <[email protected]> > --- > spl/Makefile | 5 +++++ > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/spl/Makefile b/spl/Makefile > index 91dd11a..fc9360f 100644 > --- a/spl/Makefile > +++ b/spl/Makefile > @@ -18,6 +18,11 @@ > CONFIG_SPL_BUILD := y > export CONFIG_SPL_BUILD > > +# In case we want to avoid the CPU support code, we need to define this: > +ifdef CONFIG_SPL_NO_CPU_SUPPORT_CODE > +export CONFIG_SPL_NO_CPU_SUPPORT_CODE > +endif
Why do we need this here, but not for other config symbols that subordinate makefiles use (e.g. in the normal, non-SPL case)? Shouldn't the cpu makefile include config.mk, which includes autoconf.mk, which defines this symbol? -Scott _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
