Hi Jérémie, On 2026-08-14T17:07:09, Jérémie Dautheribes <[email protected]> wrote:
> Patch 1: introduces the new etype > Patch 2: updates the imx93-u-boot.dtsi description to include the new > signing nodes > Patches 3-4: documentation > Patch 5: adds test coverage [..] > The implementation is largely derived from the existing i.MX8M support, > since the two share much of the same signing infrastructure. Given how close this is to nxp_imx8mcst, please say in the cover letter whether you considered factoring out a common base class rather than duplicating the etype, and why you decided against it. Regards, Simon
