On Sat, Sep 12, 2026 at 12:51:42PM +0200, Carlo Caione wrote: > On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 11:41:22 +0100, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 02:05:59PM +0200, Carlo Caione wrote: > > [...] > > This is better than v1. Did you look in to my suggestion about turning > > this in to a choice between hard-coded number, hard-coded type and this > > new dynamic option? I do wonder if that would let us get rid of a lot of > > the if/else nesting we have in these functions. Thanks! > > I'll try but I do not promise anything :) The problem is that it is VERY > easy to break things when touching this code and relatek Kconfigs so I'm > basically tiptoeing around it for now, but let me try.
It is tricky, thanks for trying. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
