On 10/27/26 12:49 PM, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
Hello Ilias,
On Mon, 26 Oct 2026 at 22:10, Marek Vasut
<[email protected]> wrote:
If the RPMB is not implemented, then do not warn about it.
This occurs with older OP-TEE OS 3.x :
I don't really ming getting this in, but is there no value in
TEE_ERROR_NOT_IMPLEMENTED?
IOW maybe we should move it to a dev_dbg?
What kind of value ? If TEE_ERROR_NOT_IMPLEMENTED is reported, the
dev_dbg() in the else branch will trigger, will it not ?
Cheers
/Ilias
=> mmc dev 0
optee optee: Enumeration command 0x2 failed: 0xffff0009
switch to partitions #0, OK
mmc0(part 0) is current device
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
---
Cc: Ilias Apalodimas <[email protected]>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <[email protected]>
Cc: Jens Wiklander <[email protected]>
Cc: Tom Rini <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
---
drivers/tee/optee/core.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/core.c b/drivers/tee/optee/core.c
index a47c76811cd..9b18310776d 100644
--- a/drivers/tee/optee/core.c
+++ b/drivers/tee/optee/core.c
@@ -112,7 +112,8 @@ static int __enum_services(struct udevice *dev, struct
tee_shm *shm, size_t *shm
ret = tee_invoke_func(dev, &arg, 1, ¶m);
if (ret || (arg.ret && arg.ret != TEE_ERROR_SHORT_BUFFER)) {
- if (arg.ret != TEE_ERROR_STORAGE_NOT_AVAILABLE)
+ if (arg.ret != TEE_ERROR_STORAGE_NOT_AVAILABLE &&
+ arg.ret != TEE_ERROR_NOT_IMPLEMENTED)
dev_err(dev, "Enumeration command 0x%x failed:
0x%x\n", pta_cmd, arg.ret);
else
dev_dbg(dev, "Enumeration command 0x%x failed due to
unavailable storage\n", pta_cmd);
--
2.53.0
--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
