Maybe members of the list could get IBM to add all the FUNCTIONS which are not currently callable directly from an I-Type so that a subroutine or other workaround is not required.
Phil Walker +64 21 336294 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gnosys Consulting Limited 11 Woodward Road, Mount Albert, Auckland 1003, New Zealand DISCLAIMER: This electronic message together with any attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, do not copy, disclose or use the contents in any way. Please also advise us by return e-mail that you have received the message and then please destroy. Gnosys Consulting limited is not responsible for any changes made to this message and / or any attachments after sending by Gnosys Consulting limited. We use virus scanning software but exclude all liability for viruses or anything similar in this email or any attachment -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Wurlod Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2004 10:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] How to use change(), inside a I-Desc (UV) It's not an objection so much as seeking an approach that avoids the overhead of CALL (or SUBR) by using only intrinsic functions. ------- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ ------- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
