David,
can you provide the source code for your VB test example
I cant seem to find much in the way of doco on this in the uniobjects doco wrt subkey


I can simulate device licensing without using this property but i am not sure how long that method of access will remain viable.

jak
----- Original Message ----- From: "David Jordan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 6:49 AM
Subject: RE: [U2] Do we need to put a value in UniObject SubKeys



I have been investigating this further, whether we need to actually apply a
value to subkey in a uniobject client as the IBM documentation explains what
it is, but does not say that anything should be done.


My concern is, if we feed a value into subkey that this would then be
different to the ODBC and wintegrate/dynamic connect subkeys, how does this
then allow the server to recognise that these calls all came from the same
desktop.


I ran a test with a VB program without entering a subkey value and then ran
it multiple times from the desktop. Running uvlictool this multiple
sessions but they only used one licensed seat which is correct.


I then ran dynamic connect and a session of the VB program and again
uvlictool showed multiple sessions that only took one licensed seat.

However when I ran dynamic connect and multiple VB sessions, the uvlictool
showed 2 seats was consumed. The curly was that the last line said only one
seat was used. (This may be to do with a bug in the uvlictool that is
supposed to be fixed in the latest release)



Packages in use: UVCS 2 license seats are in use. 3 license seats are available.

       Packages in use:
       UVCS has 5 licensed seats and 1 in use.




At the moment I assume we do not need to enter a subkey value. Can anyone else confirm this?

Regards

David Jordan
-------
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
-------
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

Reply via email to