"Susan Joslyn" wrote... > > You're right, triggers cannot be used on > "directory type" files. We did ask IBM for that at the U2UG meeting in Las > Vegas last September. > > Their chief argument against them was that you can get to those > "directory" files from outside U2 anyway.
I would imagine that that's more of a sales-and-marketing argument. There's also the engineering problem of directory files having no header block to store the trigger definition in. > I hope that IBM is listening -- and if anyone agrees with me that triggers > are critical in today's IT, please put your two cents in. (For all file > types, with an efficiency that makes them usable.) But I agree wholeheartedly with this - consider my two cents added. Simon. ------- u2-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
