Leroy,
I don't understand.
First you say: >However, remember that if you are using MQ as a >means of users communicating with the database in the scenario you >describe, you are using MQ as a de facto connection pool and violating >your U2 license agreement if you don't have the equivalent number of U2
and then you say:
Message queues in the user scenario you suggest also does not violate the agreement because they consume licenses (as an iPhantom); users are interactively working the U2 database, regardless of the method.
Which is it? if I use MQ series to pass messages to and from my web application or an atm or whatever to support an application user to access the database am I neccessarily correctly licensed because the phantoms are each using a db licence or do I have to worry about the number of users putting requests on the queue in relation to the number of phantoms servicing the queue?
thanks,
Craig ------- u2-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
