In a message dated 8/12/2005 4:33:50 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> That begs the question. EQUATE the attribute number for a dynamic array > (compiler replacement) or EQUATE the field for a dimensioned array, (alias > concept). I've seen many examples of both but I think they lean more towards > the DIM variety. And the survey says....... I don't think anyone is championing the cause for localizing what are in effect global variables. Rather my point was since RAID does not like a variable like EQUATE CUST.ADDR TO CUST(10) no matter where it's defined. Wouldn't it be better, at least from the perspective of a RAID user to use a variable like EQUATE A.CUST.ADDR TO 10 and then reference the address by R.CUST(A.CUST.ADDR) = '' or equally R.CUST<A.CUST.ADDR> = '' depending on whether you've created R.CUST as a DIM or DYN array. That was my point, it has nothing to do with whether these definitions are done locally within the mainline program, or as an INCLUDE. Will Johnson Fast Foward Technologies ------- u2-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
