Yes it's a possible way of 'remembering' some values but we
ruled it out for the same reason as unnamed common - sooner
or later you'll interact with a subroutine or function that also
uses them and then ...
btw named common isn't quite safe either -
it's possible that another routine uses the same name
for it's common ...
What's really needed is a 'local static' modifier.
-- mats
David A Barrett wrote:
How on earth do You implement a persistent local variable without
using named common ??
- -- mats
@USER0
@USER1
@USER2
@USER3
@USER4
This is also in the manual. :)
Dave Barrett,
Lawyers' Professional Indemnity Company
-------
u2-users mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
-------
u2-users mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
