Ross, Please tell me you are kidding. RETURN TO is worse than using a GOTO. You think you are dealing with a nice neat subroutine and then the 'hidden' goto in the return bites you.
Rich Taylor | Senior Programmer/Analyst| VERTIS 250 W. Pratt Street | Baltimore, MD 21201 P 410.361.8688 | F 410.528.0319 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.vertisinc.com Vertis is the premier provider of targeted advertising, media, and marketing services that drive consumers to marketers more effectively. "The more they complicate the plumbing the easier it is to stop up the drain" - Montgomery Scott NCC-1701 > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ross Ferris > Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 8:42 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [U2] more serious notes on GOTO > > Personally I prefer the RETURN TO syntax - all the 'elegance' of > subroutines, with the bonus of conditional exits. Now THAT was a "nice > innovation" in the language > > Ross Ferris > Stamina Software > Visage > Better by Design! > ------- > u2-users mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ ------- u2-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
