Posting flags as being done, selecting with posting flags blank, or time/date stamping is an easy way....
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mark Johnson Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 07:58 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [U2] Basic vs Execute Select You're kidding. I requested 'counted for', not counted. The earlier SELECT thread brought up the concept of records added during the processing. Thus, how could you insure that all records were processed, even those latecomers. Mark Johnson ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ralph Burton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 1:32 PM Subject: Re: [U2] Basic vs Execute Select > EXECUTE "COUNT FILENAME" > > > Mark Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A recent thread debated the speed of these 2 SELECT methods. > > My question is what would be the preferred way to insure that all records may > be counted for on an active system instead of a dormant system. > > Thanks in advance. > Mark Johnson > ------- > u2-users mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ > > > --------------------------------- > Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free. > ------- > u2-users mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ ------- u2-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ ------- u2-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
