AD: Thanks for writing. I will use this...
Regards, --Bill -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony Dzikiewicz Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 7:47 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [U2] Unix Security It looks good as long as your users are all part of the users group. You probably want to look at the umask options for users as part of the login paragraph. If a user changes a record and the files becomes theirs, then this is bad. I had something like this happen and I had to fix it by setting the umask in the login paragraph. I believe this was for type 1 files not static and dynamic. Im not a security expert, but I dont think there are any implications for print applications. I would think that as long as a user can read the file, then they could generate a report from it. What would be more important is if the user has rights to the spool directory and it doesnt sound like you're changing that, but you are changing the users group. Are you adding users to additional group users or are you changing the users group from test to users. Can the users group write to the spool directory ? Im not sure if this matters. When I look at this I ask myself what does this really gain you and is it worth doing the work (although I dont know how many files you're dealing with). Do you have 'others' on the computer ? Plans for 'others' ? Are the users all in the test group already and you have to change the group and then add all users to that group ? If you had to do a lot of work and there are no 'others' on the system, then the worst you could do is maybe screw something up and stop something that once worked from working. Thats my thinking - if it ant broke dont fix it and keep it simple. If you can try all of this out on a test system. Ive always read that when securing a system you should make it as tight as possible and then punch holes here and there only as needed. I find that myself I work backwards. I make everything 'open' so that everything 'works' and then I go back and tighten up things. I think this backward approach is more difficult. I am fortunate enough to not have a big security problem. Our server only runs Universe and everyone on it has access to every file and there are no special considerations. So, I can get away with this 'policy', but I know it isnt the best practice. Anthony -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brutzman, Bill Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 6:46 PM To: '[email protected]' Subject: [U2] Unix Security In the name of enhacing security, I want to change UniVerse file rights... from -rwxrwxrwx root test UV.DATA.FILE to -rwxrwx--- root users UV.DATA.FILE Will end-users be able to do their transactions? Will the print applications work? Are there any special considerations for UV? Suggestions would be appreciated. --Bill ------- u2-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.9/261 - Release Date: 2/15/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.9/261 - Release Date: 2/15/2006 ------- u2-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ ------- u2-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
