Ok I thanks, I don't know if I want to continue on with VB6, I think its a great language and do tend to disagree with the grown up language statement, but that my opinion. I don't know that much abut VB.net other than it complies in P code and the IDE's is similar but diffrent if that makes any since. I just spend tons of hours and may just decide to continue to use VB6 but when I finally get the application done I need to deploy it to multiple machines. I know there still programers that use VB6 so it's not like its going away. But thank for the insight. Glad I found the form. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/RE%3A-VB6-UniObjects-to-VB.NET-question-t1606405.html#a4882911 Sent from the U2 - Users forum at Nabble.com. ------- u2-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] RE: RE: VB6 UniObjects to VB.NET question
49ERU2USER (sent by Nabble.com) Thu, 15 Jun 2006 06:40:07 -0700
- RE: [U2] RE: VB6 UniObjects to VB.NET ques... Brian Leach
- [U2] RE: RE: VB6 UniObjects to VB.NET... 49ERU2USER (sent by Nabble.com)
- RE: [U2] RE: RE: VB6 UniObjects t... David Jordan
- [U2] RE: RE: RE: VB6 UniObjec... 49ERU2USER (sent by Nabble.com)
