I've never subscribed to U2-community, and probably won't. I prefer the discussions to be on this list and have learned how to filter/delete as necessary. I feel like I'm going to miss something when a discussion is asked to move . . . I didn't realize that list wasn't active, much...
I agree Dawn, and hope something moves somewhere. As an email group server owner/administrator myself, I don't envy the moderators work-load. I've not volunteered for this group because I have enough of my own to do, and as asked before, "Have you ever gotten any clients/benefits from running the list?" my answer is 'Not a bit'. I do it for my wife, who does a lot more work than I do... My 2 cents, worth both pennies, too. Karl <quote who="Dawn Wolthuis"> > I agree, Jeff. That is my point with the suggestion that we eliminate > u2-community and permit discussions like this one, even if not of > interest to all. Let's move back/forward to a list where we permit > discussions on all related topics and let people filter it themselves. > > Does anyone else agree with that or is this u2-community as a way to > kill discussions and moderators needing to jump in too often due to > all the rules (the moderators are just doing their jobs as defined), > the way we want to run it? If I hear only silence, I will figure that > I am in the minority with this opinion. Cheers! --dawn > > On 9/6/07, Moderator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> REPOSTED FOR NON-MEMBER ADDRESS: "Support Mailbox" >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >> Bounce Notice: If you read this list through Indexfocus, Nabble, or any >> other replicator - and you would like to be able to participate - sign >> up directly with us. Here's all you need to know: To subscribe or >> resubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/. >> >> >> Clif, well said! As always you are able to illuminate a murky topic >> with the light of reason. Thanks! >> >> I appreciate the time and effort that the past and present list >> moderators have contributed to making the list such a valuable tool. >> BIG THANKS! >> >> As a consumer I find myself feeling offended by the [AD] [\AD] tagging >> stuff. It's as though I'm too stupid to recognize the nature of a post >> unless it's tagged for me. Should we also require posters to use tags >> to separate their opinions from proven fact - [OPINION] [\OPINION]. Or >> possibly [JOKE] [\JOKE] to alert readers to humor in posts? >> >> I think the list needs some clear rules -- for instance, "no porn" seems >> like a good one and easily to apply. Over and above a few clear rules, >> I say let the list members post what they want to! I know where the >> Delete key is. >> >> Jeff Fitzgerald >> Fitzgerald & Long, Inc. >> ------- >> u2-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ >> > > > -- > Dawn M. Wolthuis > Tincat Group, Inc. > > Take and give some delight today > ------- > u2-users mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ > -- Karl Pearson Director of I.T. ATS Industrial Supply, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.atsindustrial.com 800-789-9300 x29 Local: 801-978-4429 Fax: 801-972-3888 "To mess up your Linux PC, you have to really work at it; to mess up a microsoft PC you just have to work on it." ------- u2-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
