Perhaps this is oversimplifying, but if you can capture the spooler file
number, why not rename it after it's been created to something with a larger
sequence?

On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 7:35 PM, Dave Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> Hi Brian,
>
> First, for the U2 readers on this list, let me explain that the ANPHOLD
> file that Brian referred is not a file provided by UniVerse.
>
> It is a replacement in SpoolerPlus (our generic Pick/Reality print
> spooler) for the &HOLD& file that is in UniVerse.
>
> It allows us to have a single Hold File in the SpoolerPlus account that
> receives print jobs from all application accounts rather than a separate
> &HOLD& file in each application
> account, which UniVerse otherwise creates automatically.
>
> This allows us to process all print jobs generated  in all application
> accounts thru one file and aggregate all print jobs on hold in the same
> file.
>
> With regard to the expansion of the length of the hold entry number that
> is assigned by UniVerse, I asked this question of IBM Support on behalf of
> one of our other SpoolerPlus customers a few months ago.
>
> IBM Support said that this request  to expand the Entry No. beyond 4
> digits in UniVerse was first recorded a number of years ago, that others had
> made the same request and that they would add my request to the list of
> others who had requested it.
>
> UniData does provide a means to expand the length of the _HOLD_ file entry
> number (and our UniData customers are  using that feature), but UniVerse
> does not provide for that at this time (ie. within the past year) as far as
> I know.
>
> I would ask this question of your IBM Support representative under your
> UniVerse support agreement to get a current definitive answer and to add
> your name to the request list.
>
> With the expanding use of SpoolerPlus on UniVerse and the additional
> functionality that it provides for managing and manipulating print jobs on
> hold, users are finding more and more uses for keeping print jobs on hold
> for longer and longer periods of time, and the incidence of repeating the
> same Entry No., even though the print job id  can not be duplicated, is
> becoming more and more prevalent.
>
> It does make it confusing when you have more than one print job on hold
> with the same entry number.
>
> This problem is not going to go away and it's not going to get better
>  until IBM recognizes the needs of the end-user community to manage larger
> and larger volumes of print jobs.
>
> If anyone discovers a better answer, please let us all know.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dave
>
> Dave Taylor
> Sysmark Information Systems, Inc.
> Authorized IBM Business Partner
> 49 Aspen Way
> Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90274
> (O) 800-SYSMARK (800-797-6275)
> (F) 310-377-3550
> (C) 310-561-5200
> www.sysmarkinfo.com
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 12:50 PM
> Subject: [U2] Spooler hold entry number
>
>
>
>  Hello all!
> >
> > I see that U2 gets the next hold entry number from an item in the DICT
> > of
> > ANPHOLD called NEXT.HOLD.  It seems to automatically "roll over" at 9999
> > -
> > it
> > won't go to 5 digits.  Although we use the BANNER UNIQUE option on the
> > SETPTR
> > command so that the actual ID of the print job also includes the user,
> > account, date, time, etc., the users themselves only see the entry
> > number
> > when the spooler list is presented to them (long story).  Because we
> > could
> > generate quite a few print jobs in a day, and because jobs on hold can
> > be
> > kept for a little while, we're running into some overlap.
> >
> > Does anyone know if (and then where) I can change the limit before the
> > hold
> > entry rolls?
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Brian
> > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
> > _
> > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
> > _
> > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
> >
> > The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
> > which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
> > material not intended for Public use.
> > Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of
> > any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities
> > other
> > than the intended recipient is
> > strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please
> > notify the sender and delete the material from any and all computers or
> > devices.
> > -------
> > u2-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
> >
> -------
> u2-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
>



-- 
-Kevin
http://www.PrecisOnline.com
-------
u2-users mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

Reply via email to