We decided to try (64bit Type30 on 64bit OS) part files on a couple of large transaction files because it made archiving easier for us. We could just drop off a chunk at a time. However, we've since discovered that part files can't be used with SBClient SmartQuery because it uses S/REFORMAT verb. As far as I know we haven't had any problems with UVNet on 64bit dynamic files on our (thirty) 2 bit Windows platforms. Stuart
>-----Original Message----- >We have a few distributed files on UV 10.1.18 on Windows 2003 32 bit. 64 >bit files would be better but I thought there were limitations in their >use on a 32 bit OS, especially with DYNAMIC files? > >I seem to remember from the UV internals course that UV/Net can have >problems accessing the file. Does this ring a bell with anyone? ********************************************************************** This email message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of addressed recipient(s). If you have received this communication in error, please reply to this e-mail to notify the sender of its incorrect delivery and then delete it and your reply. It is your responsibility to check this email and any attachments for viruses and defects before opening or sending them on. Spotless collects information about you to provide and market our services. For information about use, disclosure and access, see our privacy policy at http://www.spotless.com.au Please consider our environment before printing this email. ********************************************************************** ------- u2-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
