BUT -- right now, regardless of how it gets executed, using CallHTTP (or anything 'socket') would go iPhantom, even if just for a moment on a 'called' or 'executed' sub-sub-phantom -- and if there are no seats free for the phantom to 'grab' then it's dead in the water...
The issue isn't the 'method' used to execute CallHTTP - it's the CallHTTP wanting to grab a seat that is the issue. Thanks! David W. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org > [mailto:owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Butera > Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2009 7:39 PM > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > Subject: RE: [U2] CallHTTP vs cURL... > > On Sat, 18 Apr 2009, Tony G wrote: > > > As to phantom operations, I find it surprising that most > sites don't > > use a plugin process, where you have a single phantom that loops to > > process any tasks that are required. > > Ding, ding - I'm with Tony. I've long used what Tony > mentions here. ------- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
