It's yet another story that makes people who know and understand the
multivalue database model cringe. Often one of the reasons for migrating
seems to be due to decisions being made upstairs by people who have not
bothered to consult the people with the knowledge to inform of the
technical realities and work involved in such a major change. 

I have noticed over the years that SAP has been very heavily marketed.
There is usually a reason for a product needing to be advertised ;-).
Just because a product has massive marketing muscle behind it doesn't
mean it's the bee's knees. I'm sure this story won't be the last
expensive disaster!

Glenn Sallis
Software Developer
Flextronics Logistics B.V




-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
[email protected]
Sent: Montag, 20. April 2009 14:44
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [U2] UV to SAP migration disaster

Hear hear.  And now that this Microsoft-centric mentality has spread to 
management, I am concerned that there will be serious consequences down 
the road.  I just heard that the US power grid control systems have been

hacked.  Imagine if the US were invaded and the power grid was taken
down 
at the same time.  I am only guessing but the fact that the system was 
compromised makes me think two things. 
1.  It is physically contected to the Internet.  (Bad idea #1).
2.  It was Windows-based. (Bad idea #2)   Can an easy to access system
be 
secure?  Isn't that an oxymoron? 

Charles Shaffer
Senior Analyst
NTN-Bower Corporation




"JPB-U2UG" <[email protected]>
Sent by: [email protected]
04/18/2009 05:53 PM
Please respond to u2-users

 
        To:     <[email protected]>
        cc: 
        Subject:        Re: [U2] UV to SAP migration disaster


I can't speak for everyone but if it's anything like at our place, it's 
due 
to lack of education. UniVerse is contains all of our business logic and

Microsoft is used for our presentation layer, desktop and web. We have 3

programmers working on UniVerse with an average age of 55. In our
windows 
area we have 10 programmers with an average age of 25. Most of the
people 
coming out of the colleges and universities only know one platform 
Microsoft. They are taught nothing about processing data, database 
structure, proper logic, or problem solving. They are not even being 
taught 
Unix anymore. I think the colleges are doing their students a disservice

because most businesses are still running other platforms for their 
business 
logic and only have windows as the presentation layer. This causes a 
problem 
because when the business wants to hire someone they don't have anything

except these 90 day wonders to choose from. The candidate has problems 
because they have never been taught how to use anything other than the 
windows tools. This isn't exclusive to U2, it's a problem with any of
the 
proprietary operating systems/products and anything on Unix/Linux. This 
gives the PHB's the mistaken impression that anything not windows is 
obsolete and they should scrap what they have and go towards all MS or 
anything else that looks pretty. The new programmers are more than happy

to 
get on board with the idea because most of them want to be working in
what 

they are taught. They don't know what business logic is and they think
it 
would be a walk in the park to switch. After all they were able to build

that web page, right? They, of course, forget that the data had to be 
there 
before they could present it. The PHB's find that there is a bigger pool

of 
willing low cost employees to choose from and force all of their people 
that 
actually know the business logic off the payroll. Then the nail is in
the 
coffin. The new programmers all of a sudden discover that there is 
something 
happening in the background that they were not aware of, they try to 
reproduce it but nothing seems to work the same as it use to. Pride
takes 
over and nobody wants to admit that they may have made a mistake. They 
don't 
notify the PHB's that there is a problem, they start panicking, they
don't 

want to rehire the employees they got rid of, so they hire some 
consultants 
that don't know the business logic any more than the people that are 
there. 
It's not the consultants fault they were expecting that someone at the 
company knew something about how the company operates. By the time all
of 
the problems come to light the company is on the brink of bankruptcy. 
Where 
does the blame go, the people that left were at fault for not giving the

youngsters all of the information they needed.

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Rex Gozar" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 4:38 PM
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [U2] UV to SAP migration disaster

> I've been wondering why the Shane Co. felt the need to migrate away
from 

> UV.
>
> * Was their IT staff unable to meet business requirements due to the 
> limitations of UV?
>
> * Was their IT staff to blame, rather than the UV database
environment? 
> (i.e. understaffed, lack of skills, etc.)
>
> At any rate, it appears that either (or both) caused Shane Co. 
management 
> to look for a different solution.  Under the assumption "if it ain't 
> broke, don't fix it" I would think that management thought something
was 

> broken, and they needed to spend money to fix it.
>
> Does anyone have any first-hand knowledge of the specifics?  Anyone
care 

> to share their insights?
>
> rex
>
> John Hester wrote:
>> There were a few posts back in January about Denver jewelry retailer
>> Shane Co. and their disastrous migration from UV to SAP.  Today
they're
>> starring in an eWeek slideshow about I.T. disasters:
> -------
> u2-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
-------
u2-users mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
-------
u2-users mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

Legal Disclaimer:
The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential. 
It is intended to be read only by the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed or by their designee. If the reader of this message is not the 
intended recipient, you are on notice that any distribution of this message, in 
any form, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, 
please immediately notify the sender and delete or destroy any copy of this 
message
-------
u2-users mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

Reply via email to