I created an ETL and installed it at a client site, now the company I 
currently work for has 
been marketing it recently.? It is called "The SQLizer".? It takes the 
Unidata/Universe 
files it SQLizes and splits off the associations/MV fields into their own 
tables as part
of the normalization process.? 

When I started I thought I'd use ODBC, but it turns out it is very easy to just 
dump the 
Uni files into text files and then have a short perl program do the explodes as 
needed.
To transport and load, I am using the TMI Listener which is bundled with the 
SQLizer.? 
Target databases are SQL Server, MySQL, and Oracle.? SQLizer is being marketed 
for just under $10k.

It can load SQL "on demand" (such as overnight batches) or keep relatively 
current 
using index-based triggers.? Since it is all batch based (phantom) it does not 
take
up licenses (unless your site's phantoms *have* to take up a license due to 
being
iphatoms.)? All it's calls to sockets are in perl, it is almost like calling 
ftp to run
from Basic, so the phantoms stay phantoms.

I have some questions for folks: ? 

1) Are subvalue marks commonly used?? Right now the current users don't have 
an issue, the few tables that use it we have been splitting SVMs out into 
columns, 
but in general I was wondering how prevalent the use of SVMs has been.


 
2) Do folks generally have good metadata at their sites?? The U2 dictionaries
are often unreliable and I have a data scanner to see what the data actually is,
but I was wondering if folks typically setup their own metadata.

3) Do folks typically want overnight updates or to keep things relatively 
current
throughout the day?

4) How much transformation would folks like to do on the U2 side?? I have the 
ability
to trigger updates and then run a transformation program as part of the 
pre-SQLization,
as well as the ability to do some on-the-fly I-descriptors, but do folks 
typically just want
things SQLized to do the manipulations on the other side?

5) What other features are folks looking for?

Thanks for any info you can provide!

Steve...
--
Steve Kneizys
[email protected]


-----Original Message-----
From: Tony G <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thu, Jul 30, 2009 3:49 am
Subject: Re: [U2] What ETL?










Somehow when someone mentions BI there are suggestions for
Reporting tools, and with notes about ETL come notes about BI and
Reporting.  In my mind (what there is of it) there is a vast
difference between these concepts.  I think the confusion comes
in when a product like MITS, for example, incorporates its own
ETL functionality to accomplish what it does.  Some basic
reporting tools do the same in the name of performance.  But the
ETL performed by these tools is generally proprietary and cannot
be used in other contexts.

Now when you're talking about a real ETL platform like DataStage,
you should be able to use data from platform X with any platform
Y.  A product like MITS or Cognos or Informer or any other could
code their front-end processes to use DataStage as a data source.
This would open them for use, even with non-MV platforms like
Oracle or DB2 - and of course products like Cognos do exactly
that - but our MV-centric colleagues generally don't think in
those directions.

Speaking of DataStage, I was discussing an association with a
company a while back for providing mainstream BI tools for MV
(that option is still considered from time to time and interested
parties are welcome to contact me).  As we can all relate, I had
to spend a lot of time explaining the Pick/MV concepts which were
completely unfamiliar to them.  In our discussion we decided that
the best way to use common BI tools with MV was not to link
directly to MV at all as a data source, but to use a middle-tier
ETL tool, I could provide the extraction from MV and they could
extract from the generic middle-tier using common queries and
tools.  Ironically when we were discussing what tools they
already used, they mentioned DataStage.  Maybe they were unique
but it seems to me that DataStage could be considered a
poster-child as a successful MV application, but somehow that
marketing value seems completely untapped.  *sigh*

Tony Gravagno
Nebula Research and Development
TG@ remove.pleaseNebula-RnD.com

_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users



 

_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

Reply via email to