Well what a fine thing to wake up to this morning, I agree with many statements here - the IBM name gave it a lot of credibility, tho I persisted with u2 because of (in my opinion) superior functionality compared to other mv databases. The IBM name was even something i could hide behind when asked what database do you run on, (you can see them expecting oracle or sql server) and i just say IBM, that was fine. Rocket ? never heard of them personally - i will have to do some research, it would be interesting to know their structure in terms of funding to purchase u2, what they see is in it for them, how they managed other acquisitions etc. Good to see the management team are still in place, it gives a continuity, as to will they be more successful in driving through what they want to achieve with the rocket board remains to be seen tho ...
Symeon. _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list [email protected] http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
