I don't think UniVerse has the same limits (SELBUF controls in memory size) but then UniVerse doesn't use the same structure as Unidata in their selects.
Jerry Banker -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bill Haskett Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 11:52 AM To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] "too many values in sort" Of course, why would anyone need a BASIC program larger than 32K? I believe it's called progress. Non-configurable size limits are just __NOT__ acceptable in today's computing environment. The attendant "work-arounds" are just plain ugly, and inexcusable. The greatest aspect of PICK is the narrow gulf between the logical and the physical; database structure is logical, query syntax is logical, in fact, the entire machine is a logical machine. Twenty year old physical limitation should have been resolved at least ten years ago. :-( Bill ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Kevin King said the following on 10/25/2010 8:27 AM: > Agreed on all points. Will check this on my customer's system. > > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Dave Davis<[email protected]>wrote: > >> That's some shopping list. >> >> I haven't seen anything anywhere that lets you adjust this limit. >> >> Besides breaking the record up into separate tables, you may need to make a >> temp file that normalizes this for you, by doing something like stringing >> the value or row number into the key. >> >> I've never had anything approaching 10240 values in a multivalue. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto: >> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Kevin King >> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 10:54 AM >> To: U2 Users List >> Subject: [U2] "too many values in sort" >> >> Unidata 6.1.15 on AIX. The following command: >> >> SSELECT SHOPPING.LIST BY.EXP PROD.NUM >> >> Yields the message "too many values in sort". There is one record in this >> file with 36,457 product numbers but would that "break" the BY.EXP? If so, >> is there a config parameter somewhere that could be tweaked to make this >> work? >> >> -Kevin >> http://www.PrecisOnline.com _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list [email protected] http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list [email protected] http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
