Symeon wrote: > I still think all of these constructs as just sooo basic that if you can't > just read them either which way, then you had better think about another > career.
Yes, for an experienced UniBasic programmer. What if there is a new programmer, or a programmer that normally works in another language? The simpler and clearer the source code is, the easier, and less costly, it is to support. The source code is the human-machine interface for the programmer. Using clear structures and meaningful variable names is always a good idea. We in the U2 community want the U2 technology to become more widely used. When someone looks at UniBasic code and finds it difficult to read, they might not find "another career," they might just find another environment to do the project in. Charles Shaffer Senior Analyst NTN-Bower Corporation _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list [email protected] http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
