David, 

I agree! This is my main argument for driving the sdlc / change control from
within U2. ( And of course my product, PRC. )

Plus you can control all kinds of outside stuff - talking back and forth to
other products - from within U2.  Those other applications cannot 'drive'
the change control for the rest of the things inside U2 besides basic
programs in directories.  Plus a separate solution for data integrity is
still required.  

 

Susan

 

Message: 13

Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 17:59:11 +1100

From: "Hona, David" <[email protected]>

To: 'U2 Users List' <[email protected]>

Subject: Re: [U2] Version Control

Message-ID:

 
<297b19fd90fdb14da1c8ceff0b6cffe76a3fee8...@vaunsw139.au.cbainet.com>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

 

If you are using U2 environment a lot of stuff won't work without utilising
the VOC some fundamental or critical way. VOC entries for files, programs,
paragraphs/PROCS, etc. Granted, in some cases these don't change often.
Unless you are like some poor sites I have seen and run their entire or
parts of their application process from a paragraph or proc in the VOC file
- more common than you would like to think or hope!

 

Likewise, control information inside U2 files are in many case extremely
critical for many applications - this also needs to be managed and
versioned, rolled-back if required, etc., etc.

 

Any configuration management application needs to take everything into
account not just source code.

 

 

 

-

 

_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

Reply via email to