On 05/03/11 09:30, Steve Romanow wrote: > Git- I personally think git is best for very large workgroups working > on a single large codebase (i.e. an os kernel). It is primarily geared > to people comfortable in the shell. It does _not_ have good win32 > support so it is a non-starter for me.
Mmmm. I take your point about it being a cli program, not a gui. But why is it best "for large workgroups"? True, it makes merging stuff into a single central repository easy, but most of its features are aimed at the "lone" developer. It's just that they're the same features that are needed by a group. If you're trying to work on several things at once, it makes your life easy. Where's the difference between one developer multi-tasking, and multiple developers co-operating? Cheers, Wol _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list [email protected] http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
