What makes U2, isn't the database, it's the database interface. I haven't worked with any other language that was as easy to access/manipulate the data in the database than data basic.
Essentially, databasic allows raw access to the data within the database. So, the beef we have, isn't so much with database, nor the interface, but how to get the interface to play nice with others, once that is solved.... > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:u2-users- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of David Jordan > Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 9:27 AM > To: U2 Users List > Subject: Re: [U2] Reliability doesn't raise enough issues to keep the > list busy > > One of the things that U2 has is the KISS principle. What I find like > in .Net, is sometimes it overcomplicates a solution. 80% of my code > is in UniBasic and 20% in .Net, however I feel like 80% of my time is > taken up managing the .Net code compared to 20% managing the greater > amount of code in UniBasic. That is something I hear from a number of > developers who develop in both environments. > _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list [email protected] http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
