Symeon:
We use mv.NET with "uodotnet" and have seen various Windows errors.
Tony G. indicated that mv.NET is just a wrapper for UO.NET, at this
level, and the problem is with "uodotnet". We're running UD V7.1.9 in
our production environment and "uodotnet.dll" v2.1.1.7211.
I'm not a rocket scientist, :-) , but I tend to think Tony is
correct. I have no idea how to correct this and neither does Tony. It
seems to be a classic case of layering technology and the fingers start
pointing in opposite directions! :-)
Let me know if the U2 guys find out anything. Thanks,
Bill
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----- Original Message -----
*From:* [email protected]
*To:* 'U2 Users List' <[email protected]>
*Date:* 5/4/2011 2:16 AM
*Subject:* [U2] uv v ud
Hi
I seem to recall someone stating recently that uniobjects works much better
with uv rather than ud, something to do with connection times etc.
We are on ud71 on redhat ES 4 and do have problems with uniobjects.net with
regard speed and stability.
Does anyone have any experience / confirmation on this at all ??
Thanks
Symeon.
_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
