I was just pondering that problem as you wrote that Bill. :0)
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Bill Haskett <[email protected]> wrote: > Isn't that the truth. An interesting side note is debugging. When > technologists suggest we use a "black-box" technology approach, all this > does is create massive investigation problems in a "layered" environment; > which most are today. For not-easily-reproducible problems, logging > exacerbates the problem because now where we're looking for a needle problem > located somewhere in these large haystack logs. :-) > > Bill > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* [email protected] > *To:* U2 Users List <[email protected]> > *Date:* 5/4/2011 8:59 AM > *Subject:* Re: [U2] uv v ud >> >> Hi Bill, >> >> A little off-topic, but it seems that whenever you get 2 or more vendors >> involved in anything, they automatically start blaming the other, and >> nothing gets done. >> >> Charlie Noah >> Charles W. Noah Associates >> [email protected] >> >> The views and opinions expressed herein are my own (Charlie Noah) and do >> not necessarily reflect the views, positions or policies of any of my >> former, current or future employers, employees, clients, friends, enemies or >> anyone else who might take exception to them. >> >> >> On 05-04-2011 10:49 AM, Bill Haskett wrote: >>> >>> Symeon: >>> >>> We use mv.NET with "uodotnet" and have seen various Windows errors. Tony >>> G. indicated that mv.NET is just a wrapper for UO.NET, at this level, and >>> the problem is with "uodotnet". We're running UD V7.1.9 in our production >>> environment and "uodotnet.dll" v2.1.1.7211. >>> >>> I'm not a rocket scientist, :-) , but I tend to think Tony is correct. >>> I have no idea how to correct this and neither does Tony. It seems to be a >>> classic case of layering technology and the fingers start pointing in >>> opposite directions! :-) >>> >>> Let me know if the U2 guys find out anything. Thanks, >>> >>> Bill >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> *From:* [email protected] >>> *To:* 'U2 Users List' <[email protected]> >>> *Date:* 5/4/2011 2:16 AM >>> *Subject:* [U2] uv v ud >>>> >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> I seem to recall someone stating recently that uniobjects works much >>>> better >>>> with uv rather than ud, something to do with connection times etc. >>>> >>>> We are on ud71 on redhat ES 4 and do have problems with uniobjects.net >>>> with >>>> regard speed and stability. >>>> >>>> Does anyone have any experience / confirmation on this at all ?? >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Symeon. > > _______________________________________________ > U2-Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users > _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list [email protected] http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
