As Tony says MV.NET just uses the uodotnet dll as a pipe to the u2 server, the errors will be with the uodotnet, What type of errors do you get?
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bill Haskett Sent: 04 May 2011 16:49 To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] uv v ud Symeon: We use mv.NET with "uodotnet" and have seen various Windows errors. Tony G. indicated that mv.NET is just a wrapper for UO.NET, at this level, and the problem is with "uodotnet". We're running UD V7.1.9 in our production environment and "uodotnet.dll" v2.1.1.7211. I'm not a rocket scientist, :-) , but I tend to think Tony is correct. I have no idea how to correct this and neither does Tony. It seems to be a classic case of layering technology and the fingers start pointing in opposite directions! :-) Let me know if the U2 guys find out anything. Thanks, Bill ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----- Original Message ----- *From:* [email protected] *To:* 'U2 Users List' <[email protected]> *Date:* 5/4/2011 2:16 AM *Subject:* [U2] uv v ud > Hi > > I seem to recall someone stating recently that uniobjects works much better > with uv rather than ud, something to do with connection times etc. > > We are on ud71 on redhat ES 4 and do have problems with uniobjects.net with > regard speed and stability. > > Does anyone have any experience / confirmation on this at all ?? > > Thanks > > Symeon. _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list [email protected] http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1325 / Virus Database: 1500/3613 - Release Date: 05/03/11 _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list [email protected] http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
