David,

Could you elaborate a little more on your two positive arguments?  Thanks for 
your insights, and all those shared from others so far.

Thank you.
-Baker

-----Original Message-----
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org 
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of David A. Green
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 8:21 AM
To: 'U2 Users List'
Subject: Re: [U2] Including Code - A Best Practice?

I don't think using an INCLUDE is bad, but it must be done in the right way.

Pros:

* It is the fastest way to use reusable code.
* It can be debugged just fine if you use the correct compile arguments.

Cons:

* You must, MUST, address the variable names. I always prefix mine with 
CODE$NAME where CODE is the prefix I've chosen for my INCLUDE and should be 
unique for your system.
* You must recompile all instances if you want the change to be updated 
everywhere.
* More difficult to edit program logic, unless you have a nice editor that 
brings in INCLUDES/INSERTS for you automatically.

David A. Green
(480) 813-1725
DAG Consulting

-----Original Message-----
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Baker Hughes
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 4:05 PM
To: U2 Users List (u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org)
Subject: [U2] Including Code - A Best Practice?

A friendly discussion arose recently among some U2/MV Developers about whether 
to include code.

If any of you have opinions about the positive aspects or negative aspects of 
this practice, please respond.  Should it be adopted as a best practice, or 
rejected as special situation use only?

Many shops probably include long sections of variable assignments, or perhaps 
globally opened files.  This is pretty much accepted everywhere as a good 
practice.

In question here is the insertion of actual code - business logic or screen I/O 
programs or code snippets.

Maybe you know of methods to overcome some of the obvious downsides:
unintended reassignment of local variables, difficulty in debugging, others.

What are the positive upsides?  Performance gains?

What is the longest snippet you think should be included, if allowed?

What advantage has included code over a CALL or a Function?  Reuse.  What else?

Can the downsides be mitigated satisfactorily to justify the gains?

Thanks so much.

-Baker

This communication, its contents and any file attachments transmitted with it 
are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential 
proprietary information.
Access by any other party without the express written permission of the sender 
is STRICTLY PROHIBITED.
If you have received this communication in error you may not copy, distribute 
or use the contents, attachments or information in any way.  Please destroy it 
and contact the sender.
_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

Reply via email to