INTERESTING POINT; The work required would be about the same, shifting *some* of the liability / responsibility to a 3rd party is interesting. You would still be responsible for transferring $10,000 instead of $1,000.00 however, if ya miss a "MD2"/"MR2" conversion however! :-)
I wonder what the setup costs, monthly costs etc would be above the $0.35 or so per transaction VS: Adding an umbrella insurance policy for $1,000,000.00 for a hundred bucks a year and going "direct" if there is such a thing via the banks. ... david ... David L. Wasylenko President, Pick Professionals, Inc w) 314 558 1482 [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Wjhonson Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 11:09 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [U2] ACH Functionality in ManFact Don't do it. A must better solution, is to contract with an outside 3rd party, so they can absorb all the liability that comes with ACH processing. Who cares if they charge 35 cents per transaction, its a fair price to pay to avoid all the headaches. -----Original Message----- From: John Varney <[email protected]> To: 'U2 Users List' <[email protected]> Sent: Fri, Jun 22, 2012 8:35 am Subject: [U2] ACH Functionality in ManFact I've been tasked with writing a bolt on module to give ManFact the ability o utilize ACH processing. Has anyone done this already? If so, any words of isdom? ______________________________________________ 2-Users mailing list [email protected] ttp://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list [email protected] http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list [email protected] http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
