If the supposed access time for these records is rather quick, 200
records is a relatively small record set. Although there are technically
more elegant ways of doing this, why cant you just stick with your
proven basic subroutine call?
On Mon, 3 Dec 2012 14:59:43 -0000, Symeon Breen wrote:
Ahh yes - upto about 200 ish
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
[email protected]
Sent: 03 December 2012 14:47
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [U2] uniobjects.net
For me the key is in how many is "a number of records"?
On Mon, 3 Dec 2012 14:48:45 -0000, Symeon Breen wrote:
Hi - I have been using uniobjects.net for many years now, however
I
usually use it to call a basic subroutine on the u2 server. I now
have a little project where I need to get a number of records from a
file, ideally like the output of a list command as I have some
itypes
I also need to get.
I could do this via a select list and read the ids into a unidataset
and then call other programs to get the itype data, or I could do a
unixml probably a few other ways.
So what is the best way to do this ?
Thanks
Symeon.
_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2634/5433 - Release Date:
12/02/12
_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
