But that's not an HTML table... The HTML table would need <TR>'s & <TH/TD> as well.
We are starting to convert some of our files to XML vs CSV that THAT's overhead. All that extra room for the tags on EACH line vs just a header line at the top of the file. For importing, csv I would think would be far easier than HTML, or XML for that matter. Guess XML has it's advantages when you have a record that has hundreds of fields and you only want to update one or two, that's all you need, aside from that so what if there are a bunch of ,,,,,, on a line to mean nothing. George >-----Original Message----- >From: Jeff Schasny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 10:40 AM >To: U2 Users Discussion List >Subject: RE: Format Text in Output Data File > > >I think the point is not so much that its "simpler", certainly >not for the >programmer, but that you have so many more options. Text >size, formatting, >cell widths, multiple tables on a page, pretty much anythings >possible. As >for the overhead: > ><html> ><head> ></head> ><body> > >Everything else goes here > > ></body> ></html> > >Doesnt seem like that much overhead to me. > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Mark Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >I must be missing something. How is creating HTML simpler than CSV for >simple tables.. I may be wrong but i've gotten hung up on the ><head>-like >overhead before i can get to the cells. I would like to learn >more if this >is an easier way especially if i can export formatting. Any >code examples >would be nice. > >thanks. >-- >u2-users mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users > -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
