or possibly, it was ucompress that needed to be changed, as I'm doing a test install right now (not PE however), and I notice the files are .Z types.
George >-----Original Message----- >From: George Gallen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 2:44 PM >To: U2 Users Discussion List >Subject: RE: U2 Personal Editions > > >I believe one problem was either there wasn't unzip or there >wasn't gunzip. > >I changed one to the other. I believe I changed all the references > to unzip to gunzip, then it worked. > >George > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 2:04 PM >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: U2 Personal Editions >> >> >>I'm trying to install UV and UD Personal Editions. I had an >>old download of >>UVPE and am trying to install it. Once upon a time i remember someone >>mentioning what needed to be changed in uv.load to install it >>on a non-Redhat >>system (Debian in my case), but i can't find it in the >>archives. Anyone know? >> >>Alas, i no longer have broadband and the UD download took >>about 8-10 hours and >>didn't quite finish. I got 67.1 MB of the 68.2MB of >>"rhlinux71_601PE.tar.gz". >>Thought i'd try to install it anyway and it almost worked. >>The server loads and >>presumably is running ok, but when i try to start the client, >>i get a message >>saying the sys/VOC file is version 5.0 and needs to be 6.0. >Presumably >>"updatevoc" would fix this, but, alas, it appears the files >>are in alphabetical >>order and the extraction bombs out in the uojskd directory. >>Since the download >>is https, i assume there's no way to use something like wget >>to resume the >>download. I have to pay by the minute for internet here in >>Zambia, so i hate to >>try to download the whole thing again if i don't have to since >>the same thing >>could happen again. >> >>Of course the easiest thing would be for someone to send me a >>gzipped tarball of >>everything that extracts from "uojsdk/lib" onward. I really >>don't think IBM >>would mind, but in these lawsuit happy days, i understand most >>people wouldn't >>want to do this. Just wondering if there are any other options? >> >>TIA, >>Charles >>-- >>u2-users mailing list >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users >> >-- >u2-users mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users > -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users