I'm just a user but I like the current Ubiquity interface. I think their idea was to leverage natural language. Maybe someone else can create another firefox plugin that works more like you describe... and keep Ubiquity as it is.
On Jan 24, 9:01 am, Tom 94301 <[email protected]> wrote: > Quicksilver, Gnome Do, etc. use separate input areas for the object, > action, and (optional) argument. It's possible to move between these > with tabs. Ubiquity does not and instead uses just a single command > line with dynamic command recognition. I'm wondering why that is. > > The tab-based interface has a number of advantages: it makes it easier > to refer to commands and arguments with just a few keystrokes (rather > than spelling things out), it makes it easy to go back and forth and > refine the command, it supports command learning better, and it makes > the command structure easier to understand. > > Have you considered adding a more Quicksilver-like command structure, > with multiple input areas and tabbing? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ubiquity-firefox" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ubiquity-firefox?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
