It is 2.4GHz, is it interference from their router? Maybe the leaky NSM2
heard the noise but the tighter Nanobeam doesn't as much? Were their air
rates effected?

-Ty

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Matt Corcoran <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Maybe a problem with the cable.    The nanobeam is a different circuit.
>     Could be regarding power,  or could be regarding ethernet.   My canopy
> SMs would work with some cables that had a bad crimp or damaged cable,  but
> then when upgrading to ubiquiti, it would not work until I found a bad pin,
> or damage cable or (arg!) a splice.   Or could be a lightning damaged POE.
>
>  It would be good to do a test using ubiquiti’s built in speedtest to
> determine if the problem is on the wireless side,  or the ethernet side
> back to the computer.   Although low voltage could possible allow it to
> work until you try running a lot of traffic which increases the draw till
> the voltage drops below usable level causing a malfunction.
>
>
>   From: Mathew Howard <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: Ubiquiti Users Group <[email protected]>
> Date: Thursday, October 23, 2014 at 12:49 PM
> To: Ubiquiti Users Group <[email protected]>
>
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Weird problems
>
>   My first guess would've been that there's something wrong with the
> NSM2, but that doesn't make any sense if it was doing the same thing with
> more than one NSM2...
>
> Maybe it's because the NSM2 was a way wider beamwidth? I guess it would
> make sense if it is picking up an interference source off beam, and the
> NanoBeam isn't picking it up with it's tighter beamwidth... although I
> would've thought a reflector should be fairly effective to fix that, but
> who knows.
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* [email protected] [[email protected]] on
> behalf of Josh Luthman [[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 23, 2014 11:37 AM
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Weird problems
>
>   Tried replacing the NSM2 yesterday first.  She's probably had 5 in 2
> years.
>
> Local noise hotter than -59 and not causing problems with the beam?
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> On Oct 23, 2014 12:36 PM, "Sam Tetherow" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Bad CPE or local noise?
>>
>> On 10/23/2014 11:31 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>>
>> So I've got 31 subs on this 2 GHz AP.  30 of them never have issues.  1
>> customer has had problems probably 4-6 occurrences in the last two years.
>> Previously we've had NSM2 and NSM2 + reflector.  The signal is great (-59)
>> however from the RF end I can't even get to the HTTP interface.  SSH
>> sometimes gets a prompt, but I can't even log in.  Mind you every other
>> user has no problems!
>>
>>  Yesterday we swapped to a Nanobeam and everything works fantastic.  WHY?
>>
>>  http://i.imgur.com/beBkZ97.png
>>
>>  Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ubnt_users mailing 
>> [email protected]http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
_______________________________________________
Ubnt_users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Reply via email to