The force110 ptp is 220 megs so I'm sure the 450 meets or exceeds. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 16, 2014 9:43 PM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm guessing ~100 megs HDX as that's what the PMP450 does. Not sure price > wise. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> > *To: *"ubnt users" <[email protected]> > *Sent: *Tuesday, December 16, 2014 8:21:59 PM > *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios > > It's possible they could get AF certified in a pair of 20mhz channels and > 1024QAM. That should do ~250Mbps FD. I would expect between $2000-$3000 > per link. > > What does a PTP450 in 3.65 run price wise? Performance? > > josh reynolds :: chief information officer > spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com > > On 12/16/2014 05:09 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: > > Actually, now that I think about it, full duplex probably wouldn't be > possible in 3.65... which makes airfiber a whole lot less interesting - I'm > not sure it would realistically be able to do anything that can't be done now > with a 3.65 PTP450. > > I'm guessing they are waiting to see what happens with the 3.65 rules... I > they'll 3550-3650 if it gets opened up, and I can't see their current > products being made to work with the new rules. > > ________________________________ > From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf > of Josh Reynolds [[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 7:44 PM > To: Ubiquiti Users Group > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios > > A 10Mhz wide AF5 can do ~190Mbps HD @ 8 miles in 256QAM. If they push that up > to 1024QAM it'd look at a lot better. > > If I were Ubiquiti, I'd wait to see how the potential 3.65 rules play out > first. > > josh reynolds :: chief information officer > spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com<http://www.spitwspots.com> > <http://www.spitwspots.com> > > On 12/16/2014 04:30 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > > With all 25 MHz? I mean they can only get heavy throughput with loads of > spectrum :/ > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On Dec 16, 2014 8:28 PM, "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> > <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I'd be more interested in a 3.65ghz airfiber at this point... > ------------------------------ > *From:* [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > <[email protected]> > [[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > <[email protected]>] on > behalf of Josh Reynolds [[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > <[email protected]>] > *Sent:* Tuesday, December 16, 2014 6:56 PM > *To:* [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios > > AC gets most of it's bandwidth via some neat tricks, but primarily 80 > and 160MHz wide channels. > > 3.65 in UBNT-land is limited to 25MHz. > > josh reynolds :: chief information officer > spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com<http://www.spitwspots.com> > <http://www.spitwspots.com> > > On 12/16/2014 03:50 PM, Jerry Richardson (airCloud) wrote: > > Would solve some BH issues. > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ubnt_users mailing > [email protected]http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users<mailto:[email protected]://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users> > <[email protected]http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ubnt_users mailing [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > <[email protected]>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ubnt_users mailing [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > <[email protected]>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ubnt_users mailing > [email protected]http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ubnt_users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > > _______________________________________________ > Ubnt_users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > >
_______________________________________________ Ubnt_users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
