The ePMP is faster than the PMP, just uses more spectrum.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 8:45:49 PM Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios The force110 ptp is 220 megs so I'm sure the 450 meets or exceeds. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 16, 2014 9:43 PM, "Mike Hammett" < [email protected] > wrote: I'm guessing ~100 megs HDX as that's what the PMP450 does. Not sure price wise. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com From: "Josh Reynolds" < [email protected] > To: "ubnt users" < [email protected] > Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 8:21:59 PM Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios It's possible they could get AF certified in a pair of 20 mhz channels and 1024QAM. That should do ~250Mbps FD . I would expect between $2000-$3000 per link. What does a PTP 450 in 3.65 run price wise? P erformance? josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/16/2014 05:09 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: <blockquote> Actually, now that I think about it, full duplex probably wouldn't be possible in 3.65... which makes airfiber a whole lot less interesting - I'm not sure it would realistically be able to do anything that can't be done now with a 3.65 PTP450. I'm guessing they are waiting to see what happens with the 3.65 rules... I they'll 3550-3650 if it gets opened up, and I can't see their current products being made to work with the new rules. ________________________________ From: [email protected] [ [email protected] ] on behalf of Josh Reynolds [ [email protected] ] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 7:44 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios A 10Mhz wide AF5 can do ~190Mbps HD @ 8 miles in 256QAM. If they push that up to 1024QAM it'd look at a lot better. If I were Ubiquiti, I'd wait to see how the potential 3.65 rules play out first. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com> On 12/16/2014 04:30 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: With all 25 MHz? I mean they can only get heavy throughput with loads of spectrum :/ Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 16, 2014 8:28 PM, "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: I'd be more interested in a 3.65ghz airfiber at this point... ------------------------------ *From:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> [ [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ] on behalf of Josh Reynolds [ [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ] *Sent:* Tuesday, December 16, 2014 6:56 PM *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios AC gets most of it's bandwidth via some neat tricks, but primarily 80 and 160MHz wide channels. 3.65 in UBNT-land is limited to 25MHz. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com> On 12/16/2014 03:50 PM, Jerry Richardson (airCloud) wrote: Would solve some BH issues. Thanks. _______________________________________________ Ubnt_users mailing [email protected]http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users <mailto:[email protected]://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users> _______________________________________________ Ubnt_users mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users _______________________________________________ Ubnt_users mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users _______________________________________________ Ubnt_users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users _______________________________________________ Ubnt_users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users _______________________________________________ Ubnt_users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users </blockquote> _______________________________________________ Ubnt_users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
_______________________________________________ Ubnt_users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
