Well. Unless the hardware fails the DFS test?


> On Jan 11, 2015, at 13:49, Eric Williams {WISP} <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Mike, you called it. I have Rocket M5 as AP and Nano Station/Nano Bridge for 
> SU. Full US band 5160 to 5825. Adding the Nano/power beam for SU, I only have 
> 5700-5800 where all the RF noise is. I’m hoping for some words of wisdom from 
> Ubiquiti like, “Hey, we can do that for you guys and why did we not think of 
> that…..Good Idea, Eric!”  LOL……….All we can do is ask, right?
> 
> It’s puzzling to me with the number of subscribers that the WISP industry 
> adds every year and the continual Global WISP awareness, that it takes 6 
> months for the #1 WISP hardware vendor to get new gear certified with only a 
> hand full of hardware vendors.  So, I will ask has someone pissed someone 
> off?  Who do we need to send flowers or a round of golf to, to get the 
> Ubiquiti test moved to the top of the list so we can have more hardware to 
> serve the underserved?
> 
> There is a good chance I will be rolling a truck Monday to change out the SU 
> so I can get out of the RF noise on the AP side.
> 
> Thanks to all for the feedback and glad to see I’m not off base to ask for 
> the 100 MHz of non DFS frequencies.
> 
>  
> Eric Williams W7EMW
> Network Administrator
> 9740 Campo Road #211
> Spring Valley Ca 91977
> 619-698-3904 Ext 101
> 619-415-0070 Dispatch
>  
> Where Fiber End’s SDWISP Begins 
> Member of Ubiquiti World “Fixed Wireless” Networks {Not Satellite}
>  
> WWW.SDWISP.COM
> www.myinternetsucks.com
> _______________________________________________
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
_______________________________________________
Ubnt_users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Reply via email to