That's not the case.
On January 11, 2015 1:34:14 PM AKST, Matt Hoppes <[email protected]>
wrote:
>Unless the gear is simply unable to pass the test......just saying.
>
>I don't think it's a back log at the FCC. I think it's a fundamental
>hardware issue that Ubiquiti is going "oh crap. What do we do now?"
>
>Now. Why they don't just certify them for passive station DFS I have no
>idea.
>
>
>
>> On Jan 11, 2015, at 17:28, Mike Hammett <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>>
>> Thank you, jackasses.
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>
>>
>>
>> From: "Jerry Richardson (airCloud)" <[email protected]>
>> To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2015 4:28:00 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 5150 - 5250 in US Power/Nano beams
>Please... Part 2
>>
>> You can thank jackasses running non-compliant gear that interfered
>with FAA traffic radars for slowing the process.
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On Jan 11, 2015, at 11:40 AM, Matt Hoppes
><[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Well. Unless the hardware fails the DFS test?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jan 11, 2015, at 13:49, Eric Williams {WISP}
><[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Mike, you called it. I have Rocket M5 as AP and Nano Station/Nano
>Bridge for SU. Full US band 5160 to 5825. Adding the Nano/power beam
>for SU, I only have 5700-5800 where all the RF noise is. I’m hoping for
>some words of wisdom from Ubiquiti like, “Hey, we can do that for you
>guys and why did we not think of that…..Good Idea, Eric!” LOL……….All
>we can do is ask, right?
>>
>> It’s puzzling to me with the number of subscribers that the WISP
>industry adds every year and the continual Global WISP awareness, that
>it takes 6 months for the #1 WISP hardware vendor to get new gear
>certified with only a hand full of hardware vendors. So, I will ask
>has someone pissed someone off? Who do we need to send flowers or a
>round of golf to, to get the Ubiquiti test moved to the top of the list
>so we can have more hardware to serve the underserved?
>>
>> There is a good chance I will be rolling a truck Monday to change out
>the SU so I can get out of the RF noise on the AP side.
>>
>> Thanks to all for the feedback and glad to see I’m not off base to
>ask for the 100 MHz of non DFS frequencies.
>>
>>
>> Eric Williams W7EMW
>> Network Administrator
>> 9740 Campo Road #211
>> Spring Valley Ca 91977
>> 619-698-3904 Ext 101
>> 619-415-0070 Dispatch
>>
>> Where Fiber End’s SDWISP Begins
>> Member of Ubiquiti World “Fixed Wireless” Networks {Not Satellite}
>>
>> WWW.SDWISP.COM
>> www.myinternetsucks.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ubnt_users mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
Ubnt_users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
