When I had this it was noise. Replaced with force 110 (maybe ptp). Fixed it in a day.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Nov 23, 2016 1:34 PM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> wrote: > I ran a test from one unit to the other, but I didn't need to. Just > spurious network traffic should be pushing more than 100 kilobit. > > Latency is usually in the hundreds or thousands of ms. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > > Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > > Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Christian Palecek" <[email protected]> > *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" <[email protected]> > *Sent: *Wednesday, November 23, 2016 12:25:59 PM > *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Great CCQ, AMC, AMQ, etc. shit throughput > > How are you running the bandwidth tests? Have you tried iperf between > radios to single out the rf? Is there any variation in speed when changing > the channels? i've seen this with a ub when there is an mtu crunch, > otherwise i would jjst blame the units. > > > > Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone > > -------- Original message -------- > From: alex phillips <[email protected]> > Date: 11/23/16 10:49 AM (GMT-07:00) > To: Ubiquiti Users Group <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Great CCQ, AMC, AMQ, etc. shit throughput > > Have you tried the Alt Modulation yet? > > *Alex Phillips* > CEO and General Manager > RBNS.net > HighSpeedLink.net > *WISPA.org Board of Directors ** (2011-2017)* > *WISPA President (2015-2017)* > *540-908-3993 <540-908-3993>* > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I have a link that's a couple hundred feet. -57 or so signal with >> balanced chains. CCQ, AMC and AMQ are all above 95%. I only can get double >> digit KILObit throughput one direction. I've rebooted, upgraded to 5.6.9, >> sent in support files, checked CPU usage, etc. Modulations are 130/130 on >> 20 MHz (was at least 240/240, usually 270/300 on 40 MHz). The worst noise >> in the area is probably -87. >> >> >> I have no clue. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> >> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >> >> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >> >> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> >> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ubnt_users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Ubnt_users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > > _______________________________________________ > Ubnt_users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > >
_______________________________________________ Ubnt_users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
