Any chance the TX power is too high and deafening the receiver? If you
haven't ready turned down the TX power on both sides it might be worth a
try since the distance is so short?

--Andrew Duey

On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 10:32 AM Steve Barnes <[email protected]> wrote:

> Mike you don’t have a firewall script that add the radio IP or router onto
> a block list for DDoS attack or something like that.
>
>
>
> Steve Barnes
>
> Wireless Ops Manager
>
> NLBC.com
>
> PCSWIN.com
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> *On Behalf Of *Mike Hammett
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 24, 2016 8:02 AM
> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group <[email protected]>
>
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Great CCQ, AMC, AMQ, etc. shit throughput
>
>
>
> I did. -87 or so at the worst.
>
> I get 1 ms pings from the radios to Ethernet devices on their respective
> sides. The low throughput and high latency only seems to affect traffic
> going over the wireless link.
>
> The near side of the link is fairly new. The other side is probably five
> years old.
>
> Unknown on the voltage. No other reported issues in that area. PCs, VoIP
> phones, etc. working as expected. Well, other than network issues.
>
> I think they start work at 7:30, so I would guess that it was fine for at
> least some time until then. Didn't get What's Up notifications of issues
> until nearly 10, so it wasn't dog shit terrible until then.
>
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
>
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From: *"Scott Lambert" <[email protected]>
> *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" <[email protected]>
> *Sent: *Thursday, November 24, 2016 12:12:49 AM
> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Great CCQ, AMC, AMQ, etc. shit throughput
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 08:18:45PM -0600, Mike Hammett wrote:
> > It worked until 8 AM this morning deployed.
> >
>
> I know you said noise was unlikely.  Can you run an AirView anyway to
> make sure?  I suspect your air rates would be in the toilet if there was
> anything making enough noise to slow your throughput this much.  Unless
> maybe, WAG, it's really narrow band FHSS?
>
> You didn't mention it, but I assume you've checked that the ethernet
> negotiation is correct at both ends?
>
> Any possibility voltage is down into brownout range?
>
> It was like someone flipped a switch and throughput went to heck at
> 8:00?  Or customer came in at 8 and throughput was bad, problem may have
> come about between 5pm yesterday and this morning?
>
> How old is the gear?
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >
> > From: "Kees H" <[email protected]>
> > To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 5:17:58 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Great CCQ, AMC, AMQ, etc. shit throughput
> >
> >
> >
> > Did the link work in the office?
> >
> > From: Mike Hammett
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 9:47 AM
> > To: Ubiquiti Users Group
> > Subject: [Ubnt_users] Great CCQ, AMC, AMQ, etc. shit throughput
> >
> >
> > I have a link that's a couple hundred feet. -57 or so signal with
> > balanced chains. CCQ, AMC and AMQ are all above 95%. I only can get
> > double digit KILObit throughput one direction. I've rebooted, upgraded
> > to 5.6.9, sent in support files, checked CPU usage, etc. Modulations
> > are 130/130 on 20 MHz (was at least 240/240, usually 270/300 on 40
> > MHz). The worst noise in the area is probably -87.
> >
> >
> > I have no clue.
>
>
> --
> Scott Lambert                    KC5MLE                       Unix SysAdmin
> [email protected]
> _______________________________________________
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
_______________________________________________
Ubnt_users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Reply via email to