Why? I did not. On 1/5/2017 6:01 PM, Stuart Pierce wrote: > Make sure you reboot before you downgrade. > > On Thu, January 5, 2017 4:22 pm, Steve Barnes wrote: >> Jerry are you finding going back to 5.6.9 can stabilize this issue. We >> have Rocket M5(XM) that are doing the same thing. One sector just had 6 >> clients offline and rebooting the AP restored all the clients. >> >> We had a few clients that were having issues and after reverting back to >> 5.6.9 the radios died. Don't want to do that on a 300ft tower AP when >> its 17 degrees outside. >> >> Steve Barnes >> Wireless Operations Manager >> New Lisbon Broadband >> NLBC.COM >> PCSWIN.COM >> 765-584-2288 ext:1101 >> >> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] >> On Behalf Of Jerry Head >> Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2017 3:45 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 2.4 throughput. gotta love being a wisp >> >> >> I would advise against putting 6.0 on XM APs. As they drop subs with that >> version. A reboot gets them back but...yuck. >> >> >> On 1/5/2017 10:39 AM, Darin Steffl wrote: >> Just try going to 6.0 first on AP and STA and see if it improves. Also >> make sure you Airview scan that you're on the best channel. >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 10:17 AM, CBB - Jay Fuller >> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> >> will play with 5.6.9 later today - anyone else able to comment on this? >> back to the initial question - am i trying too hard with 10 meg packages >> on 2.4 rockets with these numbers? should the radios be able to do that? do >> i need to go post in ubnt forums? :) >> >> maybe i will.... lol >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: RickG<mailto:[email protected]> >> To: Ubiquiti Users Group<mailto:[email protected]> >> Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2017 12:12 AM >> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 2.4 throughput. gotta love being a wisp >> >> >> Yes and the time frame matches the 5.6.x FW suspicion. It comes & goes >> and so far I have not been able to pinpoint it. >> >> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 11:44 PM, Ken Patrick >> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> Jay, >> >> >> We get these complaints from customers and I have always ignored it as >> long as everything looks fine from our end. But this has increased >> significantly since the Virus and 5.6.x firmware and I think we need to >> critically look at it and not dismiss it. There is no way a ton of >> customers can be hallucinating at the same time >> >> The complaints are usually in the form of its slow or the internet goes >> off and on especially if you are on the DFS band. >> >> Is anyone else experiencing this kinds of complaints ?? >> >> >> >> Regards >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 4:45 AM, CBB - Jay Fuller >> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> >> oh, if you're wondering, management downgraded him to our lowest package >> today and said "do not upgrade him even if he asks" we suspect he'll visit >> his parents more :) base package is 3 meg >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: CBB - Jay Fuller<mailto:[email protected]> >> To: Ubiquiti Users Group<mailto:[email protected]> >> Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2017 9:40 PM >> Subject: [Ubnt_users] 2.4 throughput. gotta love being a wisp >> >> >> >> We've got an average of 14 users on our 2.4 rockets. 10 mhz channels. >> some are sectors, some are omnis. >> >> Currently one 2.4 rocket has 13 connections (one guy dropped for >> t-mobile??!!) I guess that makes sense, no one else has t-mobile down >> here.... - so here are the current stats : >> >> airmax quality - 83% airmax capacity - 80% >> >> here is the stations list and their signals - >> >> [cid:[email protected]] >> >> >> Access point is running 6.0 ; stations are 5.6.3 >> That'll change soon - maybe end of January. >> >> >> >> I have a 2nd 2.4 rocket we are also monitoring - it also has 14 users on >> it >> >> airmax quality is 75% airmax capacity is 70% >> >> also running 6.0 stations are 5.6.3 >> >> [cid:[email protected]]\ >> >> >> I am selling 10 meg packages off these access points. In some cases >> folks are buying more than that. Sometimes I can get 22 meg linktests >> using the ubnt speed tests. >> >> I've noticed in the last week or two i've seen people disconnecting - >> >> >> "i'm only getting 2 meg, this is not acceptable" >> >> >> here's my favorite - a kid files a complaint against us with the bbb - >> >> "If you can avoid doing business with this company, I would STRONGLY >> suggest it. This company is very sneaky, and claims that the incredibly >> poor service and frequent downtime is simply out of their hand. They >> offer a "completely unlimited package" for xxxxx in which they CLAIM "as >> much connectivity as your radio allows". After compiling data from around >> 100+ bandwidth connections tests over the course of 6 months, with the >> average speed being around 7Mbits (896 kilobytes). The pricing is not >> even close to reflecting the service, the cap on the xxxxxx package is >> 10Mbits, so I am not even reaching the average on that. I can only say >> that the highest tier package is nothing short of a scam. Whenever I >> called to complain about this outrageous service, I was told that it was >> too bad, and that nothing will be done. xxxxxxxxxxxxxx is a conman, >> relying on shady business tactics to further his greed." >> >> btw - i can't recall any downtime within the last year and, well, i just >> love human beings. >> >> i am wondering - - am i asking too much out of these access points? >> >> usage graphed - >> >> access point 1 - >> >> [cid:[email protected]] >> >> >> access point #2 >> >> [cid:[email protected]] >> >> >> >> btw - i should add the kid who filed the complaint lives in his parents >> barn (yes, i said barn) and has his own connection separate from his >> parents. >> >> question - am i asking too much of these access points? >> >> yes - i'm waiting on the rocket 2ac prism - - and these are our two >> busiest 2.4 rockets - - but i am also getting complaints on other parts of >> our network. >> >> ok - thanks in advance. >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> _______________________________________________ >> Ubnt_users mailing list >> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ubnt_users mailing list >> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ubnt_users mailing list >> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> >> >> >> >> -- >> -RickG KyWiFi >> ________________________________ >> _______________________________________________ >> Ubnt_users mailing list >> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ubnt_users mailing list >> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Darin Steffl >> Minnesota WiFi >> www.mnwifi.com<http://www.mnwifi.com/> >> 507-634-WiFi >> [http://www.snoitulosten.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/facebook-small.jpg >> ]<http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> Like us on >> Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> Ubnt_users mailing list >> >> >> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >> >> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ubnt_users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Ubnt_users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
_______________________________________________ Ubnt_users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
