Just a good SOP on up/down-grading. Why? Who knows, memory leaks or whatever. If it's up for more than 7 days, I reboot.
On Thu, January 5, 2017 9:33 pm, Jerry Head wrote: > Why? > I did not. > > > On 1/5/2017 6:01 PM, Stuart Pierce wrote: > >> Make sure you reboot before you downgrade. >> >> >> On Thu, January 5, 2017 4:22 pm, Steve Barnes wrote: >> >>> Jerry are you finding going back to 5.6.9 can stabilize this issue. >>> We >>> have Rocket M5(XM) that are doing the same thing. One sector just had >>> 6 >>> clients offline and rebooting the AP restored all the clients. >>> >>> We had a few clients that were having issues and after reverting back >>> to 5.6.9 the radios died. Don't want to do that on a 300ft tower AP >>> when its 17 degrees outside. >>> >>> Steve Barnes >>> Wireless Operations Manager >>> New Lisbon Broadband >>> NLBC.COM >>> PCSWIN.COM >>> 765-584-2288 ext:1101 >>> >>> >>> >>> From: [email protected] >>> [mailto:[email protected]] >>> On Behalf Of Jerry Head >>> Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2017 3:45 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 2.4 throughput. gotta love being a wisp >>> >>> >>> >>> I would advise against putting 6.0 on XM APs. As they drop subs with >>> that version. A reboot gets them back but...yuck. >>> >>> >>> On 1/5/2017 10:39 AM, Darin Steffl wrote: >>> Just try going to 6.0 first on AP and STA and see if it improves. Also >>> make sure you Airview scan that you're on the best channel. >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 10:17 AM, CBB - Jay Fuller >>> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> will play with 5.6.9 later today - anyone else able to comment on >>> this? back to the initial question - am i trying too hard with 10 meg >>> packages on 2.4 rockets with these numbers? should the radios be able >>> to do that? do i need to go post in ubnt forums? :) >>> >>> maybe i will.... lol >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: RickG<mailto:[email protected]> >>> To: Ubiquiti Users Group<mailto:[email protected]> >>> Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2017 12:12 AM >>> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 2.4 throughput. gotta love being a wisp >>> >>> >>> >>> Yes and the time frame matches the 5.6.x FW suspicion. It comes & >>> goes and so far I have not been able to pinpoint it. >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 11:44 PM, Ken Patrick >>> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> Jay, >>> >>> >>> >>> We get these complaints from customers and I have always ignored it >>> as long as everything looks fine from our end. But this has increased >>> significantly since the Virus and 5.6.x firmware and I think we need >>> to critically look at it and not dismiss it. There is no way a ton of >>> customers can be hallucinating at the same time >>> >>> The complaints are usually in the form of its slow or the internet >>> goes off and on especially if you are on the DFS band. >>> >>> Is anyone else experiencing this kinds of complaints ?? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 4:45 AM, CBB - Jay Fuller >>> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> oh, if you're wondering, management downgraded him to our lowest >>> package today and said "do not upgrade him even if he asks" we suspect >>> he'll visit his parents more :) base package is 3 meg >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: CBB - Jay Fuller<mailto:[email protected]> >>> To: Ubiquiti Users Group<mailto:[email protected]> >>> Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2017 9:40 PM >>> Subject: [Ubnt_users] 2.4 throughput. gotta love being a wisp >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> We've got an average of 14 users on our 2.4 rockets. 10 mhz >>> channels. some are sectors, some are omnis. >>> >>> Currently one 2.4 rocket has 13 connections (one guy dropped for >>> t-mobile??!!) I guess that makes sense, no one else has t-mobile >>> down here.... - so here are the current stats : >>> >>> airmax quality - 83% airmax capacity - 80% >>> >>> here is the stations list and their signals - >>> >>> [cid:[email protected]] >>> >>> >>> >>> Access point is running 6.0 ; stations are 5.6.3 >>> That'll change soon - maybe end of January. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> I have a 2nd 2.4 rocket we are also monitoring - it also has 14 users >>> on it >>> >>> airmax quality is 75% airmax capacity is 70% >>> >>> also running 6.0 stations are 5.6.3 >>> >>> [cid:[email protected]]\ >>> >>> >>> >>> I am selling 10 meg packages off these access points. In some cases >>> folks are buying more than that. Sometimes I can get 22 meg linktests >>> using the ubnt speed tests. >>> >>> I've noticed in the last week or two i've seen people disconnecting - >>> >>> >>> >>> "i'm only getting 2 meg, this is not acceptable" >>> >>> >>> >>> here's my favorite - a kid files a complaint against us with the bbb >>> - >>> >>> >>> "If you can avoid doing business with this company, I would STRONGLY >>> suggest it. This company is very sneaky, and claims that the >>> incredibly poor service and frequent downtime is simply out of their >>> hand. They offer a "completely unlimited package" for xxxxx in which >>> they CLAIM "as much connectivity as your radio allows". After >>> compiling data from around 100+ bandwidth connections tests over the >>> course of 6 months, with the average speed being around 7Mbits (896 >>> kilobytes). The pricing is not even close to reflecting the service, >>> the cap on the xxxxxx package is 10Mbits, so I am not even reaching >>> the average on that. I can only say that the highest tier package is >>> nothing short of a scam. Whenever I called to complain about this >>> outrageous service, I was told that it was too bad, and that nothing >>> will be done. xxxxxxxxxxxxxx is a conman, relying on shady business >>> tactics to further his greed." >>> >>> btw - i can't recall any downtime within the last year and, well, i >>> just love human beings. >>> >>> i am wondering - - am i asking too much out of these access points? >>> >>> usage graphed - >>> >>> access point 1 - >>> >>> [cid:[email protected]] >>> >>> >>> >>> access point #2 >>> >>> [cid:[email protected]] >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> btw - i should add the kid who filed the complaint lives in his >>> parents barn (yes, i said barn) and has his own connection separate >>> from his parents. >>> >>> question - am i asking too much of these access points? >>> >>> yes - i'm waiting on the rocket 2ac prism - - and these are our two >>> busiest 2.4 rockets - - but i am also getting complaints on other >>> parts of our network. >>> >>> ok - thanks in advance. >>> >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Ubnt_users mailing list >>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Ubnt_users mailing list >>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Ubnt_users mailing list >>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> -RickG KyWiFi >>> ________________________________ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Ubnt_users mailing list >>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Ubnt_users mailing list >>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Darin Steffl >>> Minnesota WiFi >>> www.mnwifi.com<http://www.mnwifi.com/> >>> 507-634-WiFi >>> [http://www.snoitulosten.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/facebook-small >>> .jpg >>> ]<http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> Like us on >>> Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> >>> >>> Ubnt_users mailing list >>> >>> >>> >>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >>> >>> >>> >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Ubnt_users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >>> >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ubnt_users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> > > _______________________________________________ > Ubnt_users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > _______________________________________________ Ubnt_users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
