I’d put my money on a false positive.
(a negative in this case)

From: James Wilson 
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2017 6:47 AM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group 
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Help!

The stations are in router mode, that;s one of the reasons why this is a 
surprise...  Still doing a post mortem.

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Shawn C. Peppers 
<[email protected]> wrote:

  This kind of thing is why i am a huge fan of putting the station device in 
router mode.  Customers connecting layer2 to my tower setup has always seemed a 
bad idea to me.

  Shawn C. Peppers 
  Video Direct Satellite & Entertainment
  866-680-8433 Toll Free
  480-287-9960 Fax
  http://www.video-direct.tv

  On Jan 26, 2017, at 5:28 AM, James Wilson <[email protected]> wrote:


    Stuart he was simply trying to set up a way to control something remotely 
with a static public IP address. 

    Apparently one of us was doing something wrong that caused a loop that 
Netonix caught.

    On Jan 26, 2017 6:24 AM, "Stuart Pierce" <[email protected]> wrote:

      99.86% sure it's paranoia, but I'd like to know what Mr. WILSON ( sorry I
      was channeling my inner Dennis ) thinks the customer was setting up.

      On Thu, January 26, 2017 12:53 am, RickG wrote:
      > Ya know, I've always suspected UBNT CPE leaks or am I just paranoid?
      >
      >
      > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 9:41 PM, James Wilson <[email protected]>
      > wrote:
      >
      >
      >> Looks like a customer with a static public IP was setting up something.
      >>  Even though he is on a routed port of a switch (our CPEs are routed)
      >> something he did somehow caused a loop.
      >>
      >> On Jan 25, 2017 9:04 PM, "Eric Tykwinski" <[email protected]>
      >> wrote:
      >>
      >>
      >>> I just tested STP on my little home AirRouter running v6.  Running
      >>> RSTP
      >>> on the Cisco and bridged on the AirRouter with STP enabled, it never
      >>> went to blocked on either port.  I think there might be a bug in v6
      >>> for STP. Weird part was switch was still saying rstp, and I think
      >>> AirOS only
      >>> supports STP.   I might dig a bit further later on…
      >>>
      >>>
      >>> On Jan 25, 2017, at 7:33 PM, Chris Soiles <[email protected]>
      >>> wrote:
      >>>
      >>>
      >>> Could be some kind of crosstalk and thinking it's a loop
      >>>
      >>>
      >>> I usually turn off STP unless I know there is multipath in that
      >>> segment
      >>>
      >>> Sent from iPhone 6S Plus
      >>>
      >>>
      >>> Chris Soiles
      >>> Owner
      >>> Rio Cities
      >>> [email protected] 505-966-6389
      >>>
      >>>
      >>> On Jan 25, 2017, at 5:18 PM, James Wilson <[email protected]>
      >>> wrote:
      >>>
      >>>
      >>> We didn't have STP enabled on any of the ports.  This is strange -
      >>> these devices have been working together for a year.
      >>>
      >>> It's been stable for several minutes now that I turned off loop
      >>> protection.
      >>>
      >>> Don't see how I could get a loop in one device.   ???
      >>>
      >>>
      >>> Thank for coming to the rescue!   :)
      >>>
      >>>
      >>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 7:15 PM, James Wilson <[email protected]>
      >>> wrote:
      >>>
      >>>
      >>>> I just did some Google searches and turned off Loop Protection in
      >>>> the Devices/Configuration page.  So far ok...
      >>>>
      >>>>
      >>>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 7:12 PM, Josh Luthman <
      >>>> [email protected]> wrote:
      >>>>
      >>>>> If you DEFINITELY don't have a bridge loop (like two backhauls
      >>>>> going to this tower, both of which go to the same collision
      >>>>> domain) you can disable port 2 from the STP.
      >>>>>
      >>>>>
      >>>>> Josh Luthman
      >>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
      >>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
      >>>>> 1100 Wayne St
      >>>>> Suite 1337
      >>>>> Troy, OH 45373
      >>>>>
      >>>>>
      >>>>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 7:09 PM, James Wilson
      >>>>> <[email protected]>
      >>>>> wrote:
      >>>>>
      >>>>>
      >>>>>> I have a very straightforward flat network, no OSPF, etc.
      >>>>>>
      >>>>>>
      >>>>>> Tonight I started losing connection and traced it back to a
      >>>>>> Netonix
      >>>>>> switch. The connection is up for a minute then the Netonix
      >>>>>> switch turns off the AF5X's port.
      >>>>>>
      >>>>>> Below is what it's log is saying.  I don't understand how the
      >>>>>> AF 5X
      >>>>>> that's connected to the port can cause a loop.  Help!   Thanks!
      >>>>>> :)
      >>>>>>
      >>>>>>
      >>>>>>
      >>>>>> Jan 25 17:39:37 Loop protection: detected loop from port 2 to
      >>>>>> port 2, disabling port 2 for 180 seconds Jan 25 17:42:39 Loop
      >>>>>> protection: re-enabling port 2
      >>>>>> Jan 25 17:43:38 Loop protection: detected loop from port 2 to
      >>>>>> port 2, disabling port 2 for 180 seconds Jan 25 17:46:40 Loop
      >>>>>> protection: re-enabling port 2
      >>>>>> Jan 25 18:03:04 Loop protection: detected loop from port 2 to
      >>>>>> port 2, disabling port 2 for 180 seconds Jan 25 18:06:05 Loop
      >>>>>> protection: re-enabling port 2
      >>>>>> Jan 25 18:06:39 Loop protection: detected loop from port 2 to
      >>>>>> port 2, disabling port 2 for 180 seconds Jan 25 18:09:40 Loop
      >>>>>> protection: re-enabling port 2
      >>>>>> Jan 25 18:15:17 Loop protection: detected loop from port 2 to
      >>>>>> port 2, disabling port 2 for 180 seconds Jan 25 18:18:18 Loop
      >>>>>> protection: re-enabling port 2
      >>>>>> Jan 25 18:22:19 Loop protection: detected loop from port 2 to
      >>>>>> port 2, disabling port 2 for 180 seconds Jan 25 18:25:21 Loop
      >>>>>> protection: re-enabling port 2
      >>>>>> Jan 25 18:25:38 Loop protection: detected loop from port 2 to
      >>>>>> port 2, disabling port 2 for 180 seconds Jan 25 18:28:40 Loop
      >>>>>> protection: re-enabling port 2
      >>>>>> Jan 25 18:34:13 Loop protection: detected loop from port 2 to
      >>>>>> port 2, disabling port 2 for 180 seconds Jan 25 18:37:14 Loop
      >>>>>> protection: re-enabling port 2
      >>>>>> Jan 25 18:37:22 Loop protection: detected loop from port 2 to
      >>>>>> port 2, disabling port 2 for 180 seconds Jan 25 18:40:24 Loop
      >>>>>> protection: re-enabling port 2
      >>>>>> Jan 25 18:41:37 Loop protection: detected loop from port 2 to
      >>>>>> port 2, disabling port 2 for 180 seconds Jan 25 18:44:39 Loop
      >>>>>> protection: re-enabling port 2
      >>>>>> Jan 25 18:45:37 Loop protection: detected loop from port 2 to
      >>>>>> port 2, disabling port 2 for 180 seconds Jan 25 18:48:39 Loop
      >>>>>> protection: re-enabling port 2
      >>>>>> Jan 25 18:49:33 Loop protection: detected loop from port 2 to
      >>>>>> port 2, disabling port 2 for 180 seconds Jan 25 18:52:35 Loop
      >>>>>> protection: re-enabling port 2
      >>>>>> Jan 25 18:53:39 Loop protection: detected loop from port 2 to
      >>>>>> port 2, disabling port 2 for 180 seconds Jan 25 18:56:41 Loop
      >>>>>> protection: re-enabling port 2
      >>>>>> Jan 25 18:58:36 Loop protection: detected loop from port 2 to
      >>>>>> port 2, disabling port 2 for 180 seconds Jan 25 19:00:36 UI:
      >>>>>> Configuration changed by admin (172.19.3.6)
      >>>>>> Jan 25 19:00:36 UI: Port 2 STP: changed from 'Disabled' to
      >>>>>> 'Enabled'
      >>>>>> Jan 25 19:01:38 Loop protection: re-enabling port 2
      >>>>>> Jan 25 19:02:38 Loop protection: detected loop from port 2 to
      >>>>>> port 2, disabling port 2 for 180 seconds
      >>>>>>
      >>>>>> _______________________________________________
      >>>>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
      >>>>>> [email protected]
      >>>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
      >>>>>>
      >>>>>>
      >>>>>>
      >>>>>
      >>>>> _______________________________________________
      >>>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
      >>>>> [email protected]
      >>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
      >>>>>
      >>>>>
      >>>>>
      >>>>
      >>> _______________________________________________
      >>> Ubnt_users mailing list
      >>> [email protected]
      >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
      >>>
      >>>
      >>> _______________________________________________
      >>> Ubnt_users mailing list
      >>> [email protected]
      >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
      >>>
      >>>
      >>>
      >>>
      >>> _______________________________________________
      >>> Ubnt_users mailing list
      >>> [email protected]
      >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
      >>>
      >>>
      >>>
      >> _______________________________________________
      >> Ubnt_users mailing list
      >> [email protected]
      >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >
      >
      > --
      > -RickG KyWiFi
      > _______________________________________________
      > Ubnt_users mailing list
      > [email protected]
      > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
      >
      >


      _______________________________________________
      Ubnt_users mailing list
      [email protected]
      http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

    _______________________________________________
    Ubnt_users mailing list
    [email protected]
    http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users


  _______________________________________________
  Ubnt_users mailing list
  [email protected]
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Ubnt_users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
_______________________________________________
Ubnt_users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Reply via email to