We see very odd issues with Nano beams in general. A lot of chain mismatch's. lower signals compared to lesser nanostations M5's and AC's. Just overall not a very good product and we are getting grid of them and replacing with light beams.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rory Conaway Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 11:18 AM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] R5AC Prism PtMP and nanobeams Nothing we have seen either. With that firmware combination, things seem solid. However, we haven't done any hard testing back to an speedtest source though, only the internal tests. Rory -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Shawn C. Peppers Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 9:15 AM To: Ubiquiti Users Group <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] R5AC Prism PtMP and nanobeams We have not noticed any issues like this. Shawn C. Peppers Video Direct 866-680-8433 Toll Free http://www.video-direct.tv > On Jul 13, 2017, at 10:30 AM, Scott Lambert <[email protected]> wrote: > > Is anyone aware of known issues with R5AC Prisms, first gen, talking to > nanobeams in a PtMP setup? We replaced 11 R5Ms with R5AC Prisms. > > 8.3 and 6.0.4 > > Some of the nanobeam users are now complaining of poor upload speeds. > -- > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. > _______________________________________________ > Ubnt_users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users _______________________________________________ Ubnt_users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users _______________________________________________ Ubnt_users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users _______________________________________________ Ubnt_users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
